Publications by Jill Woods
Jump to:
Peer-reviewed articles
2012
Woods,J., Jones,L., Woods,C., Schneider,S., Fonn,D. Use of a photographic manipulation tool to assess corneal vascular response. Optometry and Vision Science 2012;89,2:215-220. [ Show Abstract ]
Purpose. Corneal vasculature change in contact lens wearers has been linked to the level of hypoxia within the cornea. To assess the impact a treatment has on limbal vessels, a sensitive method of measurement and quantification is required. Methods. A group of 21 highly myopic, hydrogel wearers, with preexisting signs of corneal hypoxia, were enrolled into a study where they wore sifilcon A silicone hydrogel lenses (Dk/t = 117), on a daily wear basis for 9 months. At all scheduled visits, photographs were taken of the superior, inferior, temporal, and nasal limbal regions which were then imported into Adobe Photoshop. A red-free filter was applied to enhance the contrast of the blood columns. In each quadrant, the length of the longest visible blood column was measured and the blood columns that penetrated -0.5 mm into the cornea were counted. A control group of 11 non-lens wearers was recruited. Their photographs were taken at the beginning of the study and 9 months later. An independent, masked observer assessed the photographs. Results. There was a significant decrease in the maximum penetration of the blood column in all quadrants (p + 0.001) from baseline to the 9-month visit (e.g., superior: baseline 0.84 ± 0.39 mm; 9 months 0.63 ± 0.20 mm). There was also significant reduction in the number of visible blood columns longer than 0.5 mm in each quadrant (p + 0.001) from baseline to 9 months in all quadrants (e.g., superior: baseline 14.0 ± 8.2; 9 months 6.5 ± 6.0). The control group showed no change over time for the maximum blood column length (p = 0.638) or the number of columns >0.5 mm (p = 0.341). Conclusions. A group of highly myopic subjects exhibited reduction in the maximum length and number of blood columns in the cornea when refit with a highly permeable silicone hydrogel material. The use of photography, along with Adobe Photoshop software, provides a reliable way of measuring corneal vascular responses over time. (Optom Vis Sci 2012;89:215-220). © 2012 American Academy of Optometry.
2009
Subbaraman,L. N., Woods,J., Teichroeb,J. H., Jones,L. Protein deposition on a lathe-cut silicone hydrogel contact lens material. Optometry and Vision Science 2009;86,3:244-250. [ Show Abstract ]
PURPOSE: To determine the quantity of total protein, total lysozyme, and the conformational state of lysozyme deposited on a novel, lathe-cut silicone hydrogel (SiHy) contact lens material (sifilcon A) after 3 months of wear. METHODS: Twenty-four subjects completed a prospective, bilateral, daily-wear, 9-month clinical evaluation in which the subjects were fitted with a novel, custom-made, lathe-cut SiHy lens material. The lenses were worn for three consecutive 3-month periods, with lenses being replaced after each period of wear. After 3 months of wear, the lenses from the left eye were collected and assessed for protein analysis. The total protein deposited on the lenses was determined by a modified Bradford assay, total lysozyme using Western blotting and the lysozyme activity was determined using a modified micrococcal assay. RESULTS: The total protein recovered from the custom-made lenses was 5.3 +/- 2.3 microg/lens and the total lysozyme was 2.4 +/- 1.2 microg/lens. The denatured lysozyme found on the lenses was 1.9 +/- 1.0 microg/lens and the percentage of lysozyme denatured was 80 +/- 10%. CONCLUSIONS: Even after 3 months of wear, the quantity of protein and the conformational state of lysozyme deposited on these novel lens materials was very similar to that found on similar surface-coated SiHy lenses after 2 to 4 weeks of wear. These results indicate that extended use of the sifilcon A material is not deleterious in terms of the quantity and quality of protein deposited on the lens.
Woods,J., Woods,C. A., Fonn,D. Early symptomatic presbyopes-What correction modality works best?. Eye and Contact Lens 2009;35,5:221-226. [ Show Abstract ]
Purpose: To compare the performance of a low-addition silicone hydrogel multifocal soft lens with other soft lens correction options in a group of habitual soft lens wearers of distance correction who are symptomatic of early presbyopia. METHOD: This clinical study was designed as a prospective, double-masked, randomized, crossover, dispensing trial consisting of four 1-week phases, one for each of the correction modalities: a low-addition silicone hydrogel multifocal soft lens, monovision, habitual correction, and optimized distance visual correction. The prescriptions of all modalities were finalized at a single fitting visit, and the lenses were worn according to a randomized schedule. All lenses were made from lotrafilcon B material. A series of objective vision tests were conducted: high- and low-contrast LogMAR under high- and low-room lighting conditions, stereopsis, and critical print size. A number of other data collection methods used were novel: some data were collected under controlled laboratory-based conditions and others under "real-world" conditions, some of which were completed on a BlackBerry hand-held communication device. RESULTS: All participants were able to be fit with all four correction modalities. Objective vision tests showed no statistical difference between the lens modalities except in the case of low-contrast near LogMAR acuity under low-lighting levels where monovision (+0.29 ± 0.10) performed better than the multifocal (+0.33 ± 0.11, P=0.027) and the habitual (+0.37 ± 0.12, P<0.001) modalities. Subjective ratings indicated a statistically better performance provided by the multifocal correction compared with monovision, particularly for the vision associated with driving tasks such as driving during the daytime (93.3 ± 8.8 vs. 84.2 ± 23.7, P=0.05), at nighttime (88.8 ± 11.7 vs. 74.9 ± 23.6, P=0.001), any associated haloes or glare (92.0 ± 10.6 vs. 78.0 ± 22.8, P=0.003), and observing road signs (90.1 ± 11.8 vs. 79.4 ± 20.2, P=0.027). Preference for the multifocal compared with monovision was also reported when watching television (95.0 ± 6.4 vs. 82.6 ± 20.1, P=0.001) and when changing focus from distance to near (87.0 ± 13.4 vs. 66.1 ± 32.2, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: For this group of early presbyopes, the AIR OPTIX AQUA MULTIFOCAL-Low Add provided a successful option for visual correction, which was supported by the results of subjective ratings, many of which were made during or immediately after performing such activities as reading, using a computer, watching television, and driving. These results suggest that making a prediction of "success or not" based on consulting room acuity tests alone is probably unwise. Copyright © Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc.
2007
Fonn,D., Simpson,T., Woods,J., Woods,C. New technologies to assess lens-mediated effects of the cornea. Eye and Contact Lens 2007;33,6 PART 2 OF SUPPL 2:364-370. [ Show Abstract ]
Contact lenses can affect the cornea in a variety of ways. Corneal structure can be altered so that its thickness changes to involve the epithelium and the stroma. As a result, the curvature may be affected, but whether it is the front or the back surface that is affected depends on the type of lens used. If thickness increases sufficiently, corneal transparency may decrease. Contact lenses can also affect cellular structure of all layers of the cornea through mechanical trauma, hypoxia, or toxicity from solutions that are used in association with lenses. More serious complications, such as inflammation and infection, can arise. All these changes can be detected by clinicians using slitlamp biomicroscopes and keratometers if the changes are significant enough. Since the development of computers, optical instruments have become more sophisticated and have enabled the detection of subtle changes but have also facilitated more precise measurement of these conditions along with the ability to capture images of the alterations or defects. This article describes some of the newer techniques and, specifically, the application of optical coherence tomography, confocal microscopy, and esthesiometry. © 2007 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
Abstracts
2012
Dumbleton K, Woods CA, Woods J, Moezzi A, Fonn D, Jones L. An Investigation Into The Role Of Masked Lens Replacement On Subjective Comfort And Vision With Aging Soft Contact Lenses .
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012;53:ARVO E-Abstract 4722.
Woods J, Keir N, Jones L. Solution-induced-corneal-staining (SICS): symptoms and staining patterns.
Optom Vis Sci 2012;89:E-abstract 125625.
Woods J, Keir N, Jones L. The impact of saline rinsing on solution-induced corneal staining (SICS).
BCLA, 2012.
2011
Guthrie S, Woods J, Keir N, Dillehay S, Tyson M, Griffin R, Fonn D, Jones L, Irving E. Controlling lens induced myopia in chickens with peripheral lens design.
Optom Vis Sci 2011;88:E-Abstract 110421.
Woods J, Guthrie S, Keir N, Choh V, Fonn D, Jones L, Irving E. Myopia development – what can the chicken tell us?.
Contact Lens & Anterior Eye 2011;34,Supplement 1:s13.
Woods J, Guthrie S, Keir N, Dillehay S, Tyson M, Griffin R, Jones L, Irving E. The effect of a unique lens designed for myopia progression control (MPC) on the level of induced myopia in chicks.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;51:E-Abstract 6651.
2009
Woods J, Woods CA, Fonn D. Using objective tests and novel subjective rating assessments to compare the performance of a new silicone hydrogel multifocal lens design to monovision.
Contact Lens Ant Eye 2009;32,5:232.
2008
Woods J, Schneider S, Woods CA, Fonn D. Application of a novel method for evaluating corneal vascularization.
Optom Vis Sci 2008;85.
[ Show Abstract ]
Woods J, Woods CA, Fonn D. Comparison of the simplicity of completing an initial fit of symptomatic early presbyopes with monovision and an aspheric multifocal silicone hydrogel.
Optom Vis Sci 2008;85.
[ Show Abstract ]
Jones L, Subbaraman L, Woods J. Protein deposition on a novel lathe-cut silicone hydrogel contact lens material (sifilcon A).
Contact Lens & Anterior Eye 2008;31,5:262.
2007
Woods J, Schneider S, Woods C, Jones L, Fonn D. Short term satisfaction and physiological response in wearers of high power hydrogel lenses, refit with a custom silicone hydrogel lens.
Optom Vis Sci 2007.
[ Show Abstract ]
Subbaraman L, Woods J, Jones L. Protein deposition on a novel lathe-cut silicone hydrogel contact lens material (sifilcon A).
Optom Vis Sci 2007;84E-abstract 070038.
Woods J, Schneider S, Woods C, Jones L, Fonn D. Short-term satisfaction and physiological response in wearers of high power hydrogel lenses, refit with a custom silicone hydrogel lens.
Optom Vis Sci 2007;84.
[ Show Abstract ]
Dumbleton K, Woods J, Woods C, and Fonn D. Compliance with current contact lens care regiments.
Optom Vis Sci 2007;84.
[ Show Abstract ]
Woods J, Woods CA. Vision test that discriminates multifocal contact lenses.
2006
Woods J, Woods C, Varikooty J, Jones L, Simpson T, Fonn D. A novel method of recording corneal staining that facilitates parametric analysis.
Optom Vis Sci 2006;83.
[ Show Abstract ]
Woods C, Scott M, Woods J, Simpson T, Fonn D. Clinical grading scales: how many images is ideal?.
Contact Lens & Anterior Eye 2006;29,4:207.
2005
Woods C, Scott M, Woods J, Simpson T, Fonn . A novel method to create clinical grading scales.
Optom Vis Sci 2005;82.
[ Show Abstract ]
Professional Publications
2009
Woods J, Woods CA, Fonn D. Managing the emerging presbyopic contact lens wearer. Optometry Today 2009;49,12:32-35.
Woods J, Woods C, Fonn D. Practical guide for fitting soft centre near design multifocal contact lenses. Contact Lens Spectrum 2009.
2007
Jones L, Dumbleton K, Woods J. A made-to-ofer silicone hydrogel lens. Optician 2007;233,6104:45-47.
Jones L, Dumbleton K, Woods J. Fitting a challenging case with a custom silicone hydrogel. Contact Lens Spectrum 2007;22,6:17.
Jones L, Dumbleton K, Woods J. Fitting and evaluating a custom silicone hydrogel lens. Contact Lens Spectrum 2007;22,4:19.
Jones L, Dumbleton K, Woods J. Introducing a made-to-order silicone hydrogel lens. Contact Lens Spectrum 2007;22,2:23.
Jones L, Dumbleton K, Woods J. A made to order silicone hydrogel lens. Optician 2007;233,6104:45-47.